For years there was one dependable option to store information on a computer – by using a hard drive (HDD). Then again, this sort of technology is already displaying it’s age – hard disks are actually loud and sluggish; they are power–hungry and tend to create a lot of warmth during intensive operations.

SSD drives, on the other hand, are swift, take in far less power and are far less hot. They furnish an exciting new approach to file access and data storage and are years in front of HDDs in relation to file read/write speed, I/O effectiveness as well as energy capability. Observe how HDDs fare against the newer SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

After the arrival of SSD drives, data accessibility speeds have gone tremendous. On account of the brand new electronic interfaces used in SSD drives, the regular file access time has been reduced towards a all–time low of 0.1millisecond.

Image

HDD drives still take advantage of the very same basic data file access technology which was originally created in the 1950s. Even though it has been substantially advanced consequently, it’s slower as compared to what SSDs will offer. HDD drives’ file access rate varies in between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Caused by the completely new significant file storage approach adopted by SSDs, they feature better file access speeds and faster random I/O performance.

Throughout our lab tests, all of the SSDs demonstrated their capability to handle at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

During the very same tests, the HDD drives confirmed to be significantly slower, with simply 400 IO operations addressed per second. While this might appear to be a large number, for people with an overloaded server that contains lots of well–known sites, a sluggish hard drive could lead to slow–loading web sites.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives are designed to include as less moving elements as possible. They use a comparable concept to the one used in flash drives and are also much more dependable in comparison to standard HDD drives.

SSDs provide an common failing rate of 0.5%.

Image

Since we have previously mentioned, HDD drives rely upon rotating hard disks. And something that works by using lots of moving parts for extended time periods is susceptible to failure.

HDD drives’ typical rate of failing varies among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives are much small compared to HDD drives and also they lack virtually any moving elements at all. As a result they don’t create so much heat and need less electricity to work and less energy for cooling down reasons.

SSDs take in amongst 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are renowned for becoming noisy. They need further power for cooling down applications. With a web server which has different HDDs running all the time, you’ll need a lot of fans to ensure they are cooler – this may cause them much less energy–efficient than SSD drives.

HDDs take in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives permit swifter data accessibility rates, which, consequently, allow the processor to complete data requests considerably faster and after that to go back to other responsibilities.

The average I/O wait for SSD drives is just 1%.

Image

When using an HDD, you will need to dedicate additional time anticipating the outcomes of your data query. This means that the CPU will be idle for much more time, waiting around for the HDD to respond.

The normal I/O wait for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In real life, SSDs operate as admirably as they performed for the duration of Ayasoftware.ca’s testing. We produced an entire platform back–up using one of the production web servers. All through the backup operation, the typical service time for I/O queries was indeed below 20 ms.

Image

All through the identical tests sticking with the same server, this time suited out utilizing HDDs, functionality was noticeably sluggish. All through the web server back–up procedure, the average service time for any I/O demands varied between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

You are able to notice the real–world advantages of having SSD drives each day. For instance, on a server pre–loaded with SSD drives, a complete backup is going to take merely 6 hours.

Image

We implemented HDDs mainly for lots of years and we’ve very good comprehension of precisely how an HDD runs. Generating a backup for a server designed with HDD drives will take around 20 to 24 hours.

Should you wish to right away improve the efficiency of one’s web sites and never having to change any kind of code, an SSD–driven hosting solution is really a very good choice. Take a look at the Linux shared hosting packages packages and then our Linux VPS – these hosting solutions feature really fast SSD drives and are available at reasonable prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Sign up now. There are no setup rates you’ll also find total SSH/full root access to the server. 99.9% network uptime is warranted.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Preview the instruments and capabilities offered by Ayasoftware.ca’s Virtual Private Servers. You could start off with a cheaper VPS configuration and move up with a mouse click as your needs increase.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • We are on duty for you 24/7 to resolve any inquiries in relation to our VPS solutions. 1–hour response time frame warranty.